Critiques
This work currently has 3 conforming critiques.
Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write another conforming critique for this work, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from matinn/Matin (845)
on November 8, 2009 1:23:01 PM CST
(1)
Dear Michael,
I have a special feeling about this shot and I can feel many different stories by this! It looks familiar and touchable to me. Happy to find it hear. You know... few years ago I was working on a project and of the project's photos is here:
http://www.artsig.com/go/works/view?id=57032&forward=user
When I saw your shot, I remembered this!!
Thanks for sharing :)
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from northwaters/Paul (684)
on November 5, 2009 12:02:12 AM CST
(3)
A good beginning, but the technical shortcomings remind me of the same difficulties I faced when making the changeover from film to digital in my own work. Over-sharpening in the foreground detracts rather than adds, while insufficient depth of field makes it so that the background figure is not a cohesive part of the image as a whole. That diagonal black line does not help things. Good framing -- but needs more attention to the composition as a finished whole, I would say.
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
 |  |  |
|
|
from plopidol/Gareth (1,643)
on November 3, 2009 3:55:03 PM CST
(0)
I am sorry but this doesnt work for me. The woman in the foreground looks like a mannequin, and the girl in the background is too out of focus. Perhaps if you softend the redhead in the foreground and sharpened, just a little, in the background it might acheive the effect you were looking for imhop
Reply
Show ratings
|
From zoranvedek/Jason (1,805)
on November 3, 2009 9:17:10 PM CST
I may be way wrong here, but I think the woman in the foreground IS a manequin.....
Hand looks completely plastic there are no wrinkles at the joints, no pores, and the specular shine just doesn't look like skin. Her head also has no pores, no wrinkling, no obvious hair follicles, and I swear that's a wig...
Reply
|
|
 |
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per work, and you may comment on your own works. If you want to rate this work, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
There are no comments on this work.
Return to works
|