Critiques
This work currently has 3 conforming critiques.
Since there are already at least three conforming critiques, if you write another conforming critique for this work, then you will receive only the usual one critique point every time another user rates your critique helpful.
Write a critique
If you find one of these critiques especially helpful--or especially unhelpful--then please take a moment to register your opinion by clicking one of the buttons to the right of the critique.
|
|
from cremmins/Ian (463) 
on June 11, 2010 7:53:35 AM CDT
(2)
the image itself looks ok even if some of the stuff belongs to someone else, the "12 hells"makes no sense at all, particularly when you use 2 different colours for the text, i suppose everyones horoscope is "tomorrow is going to be a bad bad day
Reply
Show ratings
|
 |
|
| | |
|
|
|
from stmv/Sebastian (1,208)
on June 9, 2010 12:29:55 PM CDT
(3)
the question is how did you create the image? a source of other people's work? public domain material? your own creations...kinda important when one posts the work as their own.. I like the look of the image, I would put it as a ticking time bomb.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
from robertwallis/Robert (4,240)
on June 9, 2010 7:42:23 AM CDT
(4)
Technically this is the most polished of all the work you've submitted. The symbols and degree marks are a bit fuzzy, but I'll chalk that up to the file size limitation of the site. The image of the Earth floating in a layer of astral clouds and sunshine beams coming through is a bit illogical but within artistic license. Graphically it's okay, and a design that's not bad. What puzzles the hell out of me is the cryptic reference to 12 Hells that seems to carry over from your previous two submissions. Dante posited seven hells, and I have no clue how you are linking the 12 signs of the Zodiac to 12 Hells. The message you're sending is garbled as hell itself and makes no sense. You need to clean up your artist statement on this and throw the rest of us a bone so we can understand what you're trying to say here. Like I said earlier, it's the best aesthetics you've done, but it's getting garbled in the translation. You would have been better off saying nothing rather than clouding the issue.
Reply
Show ratings
|
|
|
Comments
Comments are different from critiques. Comments carry no rating, you may write more than one comment per work, and you may comment on your own works. If you want to rate this work, then you should write a critique instead.
Add a comment
There are no comments on this work.
Return to works
|
